Objections to Mary’s request for acquittal from the Avonfield reference

0
50


Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Vice President Maryam Nawaz during the PDM rally Photo: AFP

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has rejected the objections raised by the Registrar’s Office of the court on a new plea of ​​acquittal from the Avonfield reference of PML-N Vice President Maryam Nawaz. Geo News. Reported on Wednesday.

The IHC’s registrar’s office filed two objections to Mary’s request after she filed Tuesday.

The PML-N vice-president along with his lawyer Advocate Irfan Qadir appeared before an IHC bench comprising Amir Farooq and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani.

Justice Farooq remarked that the objections raised by the Registrar’s Office were being rejected.

Addressing Advocate Qadir, Justice Farooq said that the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) has also filed a petition seeking hearing of the petition on a daily basis and its termination within a month.

Advocate Qadir, citing paragraph 3, “ridiculed” the NAB’s plea and asked the court to dismiss the petition while imposing a fine on the accountability watchdog for filing such a petition.

The court issued notice to the parties and adjourned the hearing of the new and important petition till October 13.

Mary apologized to the Avonfield reference

Maryam filed a petition in the Islamabad High Court on Tuesday seeking annulment of the Avonfield Apartments reference decision.

In her petition, Maryam said the decision was a complete violation of the law and a classic example of political engineering in Pakistan’s history. “The Supreme Court oversaw the entire investigation of the case and oversaw the prosecution,” he added.

The petition asked the IHC to take notice of the “serious violations” and set aside the Avonfield reference decision while acquitting all the culprits.

The IHC registrar raised two objections to Maryam’s request. The IHC’s registrar’s office said Maryam had made the same appeal in a central petition challenging the Avonfield reference decision.

Secondly, the petitioner can obtain fresh grounds only with the permission of the court.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here