ISLAMABAD: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) on Tuesday filed a petition in the Islamabad High Court alleging that PML-N Vice President Maryam Nawaz and her husband retired Captain Muhammad Safdar were given in Avonfield. Post-arrest bail canceled. Properties reference
Maryam Nawaz and her husband Capt (retd) Muhammad Safdar were released from Adiala Jail on September 19 after the Islamabad High Court suspended their imprisonment in the Avonfield corruption case.
The Anti-Corruption Watchdog said in its petition that Maryam and Safdar misused the bail exemption.
The Anti-Corruption Watchdog argued that Maryam made hate speeches against the NAB. The NAB said that the conduct of the accused put pressure on witnesses who wanted to testify against them, adding that its Lahore office was attacked during the appearance of PML-N leaders before the investigating officers.
The petition said that Maryam Nawaz considers every appearance of NAB as a political theater and transforms the court room into a press club. The NAB alleged that it did not care about the court decoration.
The petition further said that after every NAB appearance, the PML-N leaders “make provocative remarks against top officials” and the anti-corruption watchdog.
The NAB told the court that the accountability court had on July 6, 2018, in the Avonfield Properties corruption reference, sentenced Maryam Nawaz to 7 years imprisonment and a fine of 2 2 million.
The NAB said that the PML-N leader had also been disqualified by the accountability court for any public office, and requested the court to cancel the bail granted to Maryam and Safdar on September 19, 2018.
The IHC granted Maryam an extension to hire a new lawyer
On September 8, the Islamabad High Court extended Maryam’s request to hire a new lawyer before September 23 on a request to challenge the sentence passed in the Avonfield reference.
A two-member bench comprising Justice Amir Farooq and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani was hearing the petitions filed by Maryam and Safdar.
During the hearing that day, Maryam took the position that her lawyer Advocate Amjad Pervez had apologized for not representing her case further due to illness.
He had approached the court for an extension to hire a new lawyer.
“I want to file another petition to bring out some facts,” Maryam said. “I do not want to give the impression that the case is being delayed,” he added.
Justice Farooq remarked that Maryam has the right to hire a lawyer of her choice and to file a petition, so the court will not object to it.