ISIS’s moderate operation in Afghanistan has led to sectarian strife.
ISIS-K says it was responsible for last Friday’s suicide attack on a Shiite mosque in the northern Afghan city of Kunduz, allegedly carried out by an Uighur ethnic group. Al Jazeera reported that the group said that “the attack targeted both Shiites and the Taliban because they wanted to expel the Uighurs to meet the demands from China.” The Russian Foreign Ministry has issued a statement condemning the attack as an attempt to destabilize Afghanistan during this new phase in its history.
Therefore, the terrorist group clearly sought to promote sectarian divisions in Afghanistan in order to undermine the Taliban’s de facto rule in the country. Considering the beliefs of those who were targeted, ISIS may have hoped to provoke a response from Iran. From his point of view, it would be ideal if Tehran were concerned about the Taliban’s ability to protect the Shiite community. This could increase mistrust between the two sides and lead to wider regional divisions.
ISIS’s moderate operation in Afghanistan has sparked a sectarian conflict that could tarnish the Taliban’s reputation for trying hard to reform over the past year, and possibly to some degree of secrecy. Iran could be involved. This hybrid war plan of its co-religionists is ambitious, but it may not succeed, whether complete or partial. The Taliban cannot be blamed for what happened because it is impossible to ensure perfect security at any time, let alone in a war-torn country like Afghanistan.
The terrorists also want to signal that the country’s de facto leaders will have to pay a heavy price for their partnership with China. ISIS-K hates the People’s Republic because of the successful counter-terrorism operations of the so-called “East Turkestan Islamic Movement” (ETIM) against separatists. Earlier reports indicate that the two groups have close ties. The Taliban promised as part of their February 2020 peace deal with the United States that Afghan territory would not be used to threaten any third country.
That includes China, so why did the Taliban take action against ETIM, which partially provoked the ISIS terrorist attack last Friday. Although the terrorists thought they would tarnish the Taliban’s image and make it feel incapable of ensuring the safety of Afghan Shiites, they did insist that the country’s defensive leaders keep their anti-terrorism promises. How serious they are in fulfilling. . ETIM’s ISIS partners carried out the suicide attack in retaliation against the Taliban for seeking to deport separatists.
Those who may have been skeptical of the Taliban’s anti-terrorism promises should reconsider their position. The Taliban are so serious about it that ISIS has targeted it in response. The international community should provide more support to this group so that it can deal effectively with these terrorist threats. Although no country has yet formally recognized Afghanistan’s Taliban-led government, they can still share relevant intelligence with it and provide it with much-needed humanitarian assistance to avert an impending crisis. can.
If Afghanistan suffers from poverty and famine, then there may be more and more frustrated people who can recruit ISIS-K, ETIM, and others for their terrorist purposes. There will always be people who support terrorists for whatever personal reason, but it should not be forgotten that some people join such groups for economic reasons. Therefore, the international community must make every effort to ensure that the possible consignment of terrorists from Afghanistan is kept to a minimum.
As far as the Taliban is concerned, it must double its promises against terrorism in order to root out ISIS-K, ETIM and others wherever they are in Afghanistan. The world must also understand how dangerous ETIM is now that ISIS-K is now carrying out suicide attacks in solidarity with the group. It justifies China’s counterterrorism efforts, which the United States has falsely described as “genocide.” With these observations in mind, it can be said that ISIS-K’s latest attack actually resulted in further assignments to its ETIM partners.